GyulyVGC/sniffnet

Choose this fork only if your main goal is translation work. For almost any general Sniffnet deployment, upstream is the better base because this fork is far behind and does not add meaningful functional breadth.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need a frozen snapshot. This fork adds no visible features and is best treated as stale baseline material rather than a maintained distribution.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need the older snapshot. This fork adds no visible features and is far behind active upstream development, so it is a poor choice for adopters who want current functionality or maintenance.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this older fork’s customizations and are prepared to maintain a large rebase burden. This fork looks useful as an experiment or internal base, not as a drop-in replacement.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need this older snapshot; this fork adds nothing visible and trails upstream by 70 commits.

Choose upstream unless you specifically want this exact snapshot or a very clean starting point for your own fork. This fork adds no visible capabilities and is behind upstream, so it is weaker for most adopters.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need a frozen copy; this fork adds no visible features and is substantially behind current upstream.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need this older snapshot. This fork adds no visible capabilities and appears stale, so it is a poor choice for adopters who want current features, fixes, or support.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need this exact stale snapshot; this fork offers no visible enhancements and lags far behind current Sniffnet.