Choose this fork only if you want a lightly customized self-hosted variant and can tolerate being far behind upstream. For most adopters, upstream looks safer because it is much more actively maintained and already includes many newer fixes.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork as a mirror or pinned snapshot. It adds no new capabilities and is slightly behind on maintenance.
Prefer the upstream project unless you specifically want this fork’s repository identity or a pinned copy; it offers no visible feature advantage and is slightly behind.
Prefer this fork if you want a more opinionated, AI-augmented Web-Check with JA4 fingerprinting, analysis history, and stronger Docker workflows. Prefer upstream if you want the newest merged fixes and the most conservative, well-traveled codebase.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need a frozen March 2025 snapshot. This fork adds no evident value beyond being an unchanged copy and is behind current maintenance.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need an old, untouched snapshot; this fork adds no visible capabilities and is materially out of date.
Choose this fork if localization and a fork-specific deployment path matter more than staying current with upstream. Choose upstream if you want the latest fixes and the lowest maintenance risk.
Choose upstream unless you specifically need a frozen older snapshot. This fork adds no clear capabilities, is materially behind current upstream, and is best treated as a stale mirror rather than an improved variant.
This fork looks like a stale, non-differentiated copy of upstream. Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need the March 2024 snapshot.
fkcyber/web-check
34/100
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this older snapshot. For adoption, this fork offers no evident added value and carries clear maintenance and drift risk.