NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler

Choose this fork only if you explicitly want a smaller, older branch and are willing to lose recent upstream capability. For most adopters, current upstream is the better default because this fork is materially stale and likely incomplete.

Choose this fork only if the reduced scope is the point. For most adopters, upstream is the safer default because it is far more current and much broader in platform support.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically want an older, minimally changed fork. This fork looks stale rather than differentiated, so adopters should expect to lose newer features and fixes in exchange for no clear fork-specific benefit.

Choose this fork only if you need its existing custom behavior and can live without upstream freshness. For most adopters, upstream looks safer because it is much newer and broader; this fork is best treated as a legacy, highly customized branch.

Choose this fork only if you want the learning-focused older base and its few targeted tweaks; choose upstream if you want broader platform coverage and active maintenance.

Choose upstream unless you specifically want this fork's client-abstraction direction and can tolerate losing newer fixes and some platform coverage. This fork is better as a reference implementation or customization base than as a drop-in production crawler.

Adopt this fork only if you specifically want its older customized behavior and are comfortable owning a stale, significantly diverged codebase. If you want broad platform coverage, active maintenance, and easier forward compatibility, upstream is the better default.

Prefer upstream unless you need a static snapshot. This fork adds nothing visible, while trailing 266 commits makes it a poor choice for adopters who want current fixes or newer crawling workflows.