Discofork
Repository brief

agno-agi/agno

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis
cached 2026-03-30T15:45:26.389Z
1mo ago

agno-agi/agno

Agno is a large, active open source framework/runtime for building agentic software. It focuses on agents, teams, and workflows with production serving, monitoring, and governance, and it has strong ecosystem traction: 39,038 stars, 5,174 forks, and recent commits through 2026-03-30.

GitHub
Loading tags...
Stars39,038
Forks5,174
Default branchmain
Last pushed2026-03-30T15:11:48Z
Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

10 of 10 fork briefs
Selected

Choose this fork only if you need the legacy Phidata shape or its notebook/demo-oriented workflow. If you want the current Agno runtime, governance, integrations, and production control plane, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need legacy phidata behavior and are prepared to live without most recent Agno capabilities. For new production work, upstream Agno is the safer default because this fork is stale and significantly diverged.

Choose this fork only if you want its custom additions and are prepared to maintain a materially divergent codebase. If you want current Agno capabilities, integrations, and runtime behavior, upstream is the safer choice.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically want a simplified, heavily customized older branch and are prepared to maintain missing production features yourself. For most adopters, upstream Agno is the safer choice because it is far more active, much more complete, and clearly centered on the runtime, governance, and control-plane workflow.

Choose this fork only if you want its opinionated rewrite and are comfortable owning divergence. For most adopters who want a production-ready, current Agno, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need its xAI/Grok-specific customization and are comfortable owning a stale, deeply diverged codebase. If you want the current Agno feature set, integrations, and maintenance cadence, upstream is the safer default.

Choose this fork only if you need to stay on the older assistant-focused lineage. If you want active maintenance, production runtime features, and current integrations, upstream Agno is the better default.

Choose this fork only if you want a Groq-centered, simplified assistant stack and accept losing much of upstream’s newer production/runtime surface. For most adopters building or operating agentic software at scale, upstream is the safer default.

Prefer upstream Agno if you want the full current framework, runtime, control-plane, and active maintenance. Prefer this fork only if its older, narrower assistant-centric behavior and specific integrations are exactly what you need and you are willing to maintain the gap yourself.

Choose the fork only if you want its custom workflow/runtime direction and are willing to absorb major divergence. If you want broad upstream compatibility, current fixes, and production support patterns, upstream is the safer default.