cart/bevy
active
significant_divergence
Selected Prefer this fork only if you want its custom mobile/web/example workflow and are prepared to own a large divergence from upstream. If you want the broadest Bevy feature set, easier upgrades, and community-aligned docs/examples, upstream is the safer choice.
kcking/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if OpenXR support is the main requirement and you are comfortable living on an old, highly divergent Bevy branch. For general Bevy development, upstream is the better default.
momo-AUX1/bevy
slowing
significant_divergence
Choose this fork if UWP support is the priority and you are comfortable owning a heavily diverged Bevy branch. Choose upstream if you want the broadest feature completeness, cleaner migration path, and lower maintenance burden.
Veercodeprog/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you specifically want its custom ECS/rendering direction and are prepared to own a large long-term merge burden. If your goal is a stable Bevy baseline with current upstream fixes, upstream main is the safer choice.
deeptesh-rout/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Adopt this fork only if you need its specific older behavior or local workflow additions. For most new work, upstream Bevy is the safer choice because this fork is materially stale and likely missing many recent fixes and examples.
mrk-its/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you need its legacy/custom behavior and are willing to stay on an old Bevy line. For new work or active development, upstream is the safer choice because this fork is materially stale and likely missing many recent fixes and features.
miniex/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you want a custom Bevy branch and are prepared to maintain it yourself. For most adopters, upstream Bevy is the safer default because this fork is stale, deeply diverged, and likely missing common asset and ECS pathways.
aarthificial/bevy
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its older, customized codebase and are prepared to maintain it yourself. For most adopters, upstream Bevy is the better choice because this fork is stale and diverged far enough that it will miss a large amount of recent engine work.
aevyrie/bevy
active
significant_divergence
Prefer this fork if you want a rendering-centric Bevy variant and are willing to own divergence. Prefer upstream if you need the broadest compatibility, the standard docs/examples path, or the lowest maintenance risk.
mockersf/bevy
active
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you want a deeply customized Bevy baseline and can absorb ongoing merge and migration work. If you want a stable, upstream-compatible Bevy, this fork is too divergent.