bigskysoftware/htmx

Prefer upstream htmx unless you explicitly want this fork’s source formatting or a personal sandbox. It does not show meaningful functional expansion, and its 530-commit lag makes it a higher-risk adoption than upstream.

Choose this fork only if you want a frozen, self-contained experimental snapshot. If you need current htmx behavior, active maintenance, or easy upstream compatibility, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork if you specifically need its custom form-inclusion or error-routing behavior and are comfortable carrying a stale fork. If you want the safest long-term path, upstream htmx is better maintained and likely a better default.

Choose this fork only if you specifically want the extra demo/documentation direction and can tolerate an old, divergent codebase. For normal adoption, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need an older, frozen htmx snapshot with extra docs/test packaging or legacy compatibility work. For most adopters, upstream is the better default because this fork is stale and materially behind.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need this exact older snapshot; the fork adds no visible capabilities and is materially behind current htmx.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need an old frozen snapshot; this fork adds no visible value and is far behind current htmx.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact old snapshot; this fork adds no functionality and is materially stale.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically want its experimental/demo-oriented direction. For normal htmx adoption, upstream is the safer and more current choice.