chinabugotech/hutool

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older custom behavior; this fork is materially stale and diverged, so adopting it now means giving up a large amount of later Hutool maintenance and compatibility work.

Choose the fork only if you need its custom local behavior and are prepared to maintain it yourself. For most adopters, upstream is the better default because it is much newer, actively maintained, and already contains fixes the fork appears to miss.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need a frozen historical snapshot; this fork adds no visible features and is materially behind active upstream maintenance.

Choose this fork only if you need its specific local changes and are comfortable owning maintenance. For most adopters, upstream Hutool is the safer default because it is active, much less divergent, and likely more complete.

Prefer this fork only if you want the customized 5.5.1 codebase and are prepared to maintain it yourself. For most adopters, upstream is the better choice because it is active, much newer, and far less risky.

Choose this fork only if you need its legacy behavior or local patches. For new work, or for teams that want active maintenance and compatibility with current Hutool, upstream is the better default.

Prefer this fork only if you are locked to its legacy behavior or its small local additions. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because this fork is materially outdated and carries substantial maintenance risk.

Choose this fork only if you need its legacy API shape or its extra concurrency/testing helpers. For new projects or anyone wanting current Hutool capabilities, upstream is the safer default.

Choose this fork only if you need its legacy 4.x behavior or a very specific local utility customization. For most adopters, upstream Hutool is the safer choice because it is actively maintained, broader in scope, and far less risky to adopt.