cypress-io/cypress

Prefer this fork only if its CI and framework-matrix changes match your exact environment and you are prepared to maintain a large divergence. If you mainly want current Cypress stability and upstream support, the upstream repo is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need its older, customized Cypress baseline and can own the long-term maintenance cost. For most adopters, upstream is the better choice because it is active, much newer, and far easier to keep secure and compatible.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its custom, pared-down baseline and can absorb the maintenance cost. If you want current Cypress behavior, active upstream compatibility, or full test/release coverage, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need its custom testing/runtime changes and are prepared to maintain a large downstream delta. If you want current Cypress behavior and low operational risk, upstream is the safer default.

Prefer this fork only if you need an older, customized Cypress baseline and are willing to own maintenance. If you want current Cypress capabilities, active bugfixes, and lower long-term integration cost, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need its customized, older Cypress environment and are prepared to maintain it yourself. If you want a current, broadly supported browser-testing framework, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need an older, customized Cypress baseline. This fork looks valuable for pinned internal usage or bespoke build/runtime changes, but it is too stale and too divergent for most adopters who want current Cypress behavior and maintenance.