danielmiessler/SecLists

Choose this fork only if you specifically want a customized, frozen SecLists corpus. If you want current coverage, ongoing fixes, and the latest curated lists, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer this fork if you want a broader, more customized SecLists distribution and can tolerate path churn and upstream lag. Prefer upstream if you need the most current, stable, and script-friendly repository layout.

Choose upstream if you want the maintained, current SecLists. Choose this fork only if you explicitly need the older 2015-era snapshot and its custom legacy payloads or want to preserve that specific fork state.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically want its reworked wordlist set and can tolerate lag and path churn. For general use, upstream SecLists is the safer choice because it is newer, better maintained, and more complete.

Prefer this fork if you want a more customized and expansive wordlist corpus and can tolerate drift from upstream. Prefer upstream if you need the freshest curated lists, active maintenance, and lower integration risk.

Choose this fork only if you want a stale but heavily customized SecLists snapshot. If you want breadth, current maintenance, and upstream compatibility, the upstream repository is the better default.

Prefer this fork only if its added password corpora and repackaged lists match your workflow. If you want the broadest, freshest SecLists coverage and active maintenance, upstream is the safer choice.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly want this fork's older, niche additions and are comfortable giving up freshness, coverage, and maintenance. This fork reads as a stale, divergent snapshot rather than a better-maintained replacement.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older, customized wordlist layout. Choose the fork only if you value local curation or legacy compatibility more than freshness and maintenance.