daytonaio/daytona

Prefer this fork if you need a customized Daytona derivative centered on API/client and workflow changes. Prefer upstream if you want the most current fixes, broader ecosystem support, and lower maintenance risk.

Prefer this fork only if you want a near-upstream Daytona snapshot for internal tracking or lightweight experimentation. If you want the latest fixes, SDK updates, and operational improvements, upstream is the better choice.

Adopt this fork only if you specifically want a clean, near-upstream starting point. If you want current Daytona features and fixes, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork only if its added permissioning, sandbox sizing, and session/computer-use changes match your product needs. If you want the latest Daytona fixes, SDK updates, and lower maintenance risk, upstream is the safer default.

Choose this fork only if its added product workflows are directly valuable and you are comfortable owning divergence. For most adopters who want the broadest SDK support and lowest integration risk, upstream Daytona is the safer default.

Choose this fork only if you need its custom API/terminal/computer-use direction and are willing to maintain a large divergence. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because it is much more active and likely more complete.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically want a clean, non-divergent copy of Daytona. If you want current bug fixes, SDK updates, or a maintained base, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork only if its added provider/access workflows match your deployment and you can absorb long-term maintenance. If you want the current Daytona feature set, API parity, and ongoing fixes, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer this fork only if the added Claude/agent workflow focus matches your use case and you are prepared to maintain a large upstream delta. If you want a stable Daytona base with current SDK and API behavior, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer this fork only if you want to fork Daytona into a substantially different product and are prepared to own maintenance. If you want a compatible, actively maintained Daytona base, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you want the sample-app direction or are deliberately curating a custom Daytona derivative. For production platform work, API clients, or anything that depends on current upstream behavior, the upstream repo is the safer default.

Choose this fork only if you specifically want its customized, sample-oriented snapshot and are willing to own divergence. If you need the current Daytona platform, SDKs, and ongoing fixes, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you want its added provider/access workflows and are prepared to own a large, stale divergence. If you want the current Daytona platform, SDKs, and API surface, upstream is the safer choice.

Prefer this fork only if its custom builder/network/admin behavior is specifically what you need and you are prepared to maintain a large, outdated codebase. If you want current Daytona capabilities, SDK parity, and active fixes, upstream is the safer choice.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically want its older dev-environment-manager direction and the custom workflow/API changes it carries. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because this fork is stale, far behind, and likely missing recent fixes and client updates.

Prefer this fork only if you want a clean, unchanged Daytona snapshot. If you need current fixes, SDK updates, or an actively maintained downstream, use upstream instead or rebase this fork first.

Choose this fork only if its added control-plane and API/UI work is specifically what you need and you can absorb ongoing merge debt. If you want the safest path to current Daytona functionality, upstream is the better default because this fork looks materially behind and highly divergent.

Choose this fork only if its extra dashboard, sizing, and computer-use changes match your product direction and you can own the merge debt. If you want current Daytona behavior, broader SDK freshness, and upstream fixes, upstream is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if you need the added toolbox/computer-use and sandbox workflow customization and are prepared to own divergence. If you want the most current, lowest-risk Daytona, upstream is the better default.