Discofork
Repository brief

dockur/windows

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis
cached 2026-03-30T12:51:17.189Z
3mo ago

dockur/windows

dockur/windows is a highly active, widely forked project for running Windows inside a Docker container. It appears practical rather than experimental: it is maintained on the `master` branch, updated recently, and ships with Docker Compose, Kubernetes, and devcontainer support.

GitHub
Loading tags...
Stars50,761
Forks4,166
Default branchmaster
Last pushed2026-03-23T14:18:43Z
Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

9 of 9 fork briefs
Selected

Prefer this fork only if its compose/defaults changes match your exact deployment needs; otherwise upstream is the better default because it is far more current and substantially more maintained.

Choose this fork if you want a near-upstream Windows container setup with minor Compose customization and you are comfortable absorbing upstream maintenance gaps. Choose upstream if you want the freshest fixes and broadest support surface.

Choose this fork if you want a Kasm-focused, heavily prebuilt environment with lots of bundled desktop tooling. Avoid it if you want the current upstream Windows container experience, because this fork is substantially divergent and materially behind upstream.

Choose this fork if you want a narrower, more opinionated local Windows container with multi-arch support. Prefer upstream if you need the full version matrix, turnkey ISO-based setup, or the broader deployment options that dockur/windows documents and maintains.

Choose this fork only if you specifically want its compose-file customization and do not need current upstream fixes. For most users, upstream is the better default because it is much more active and materially ahead.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need a frozen copy; this fork does not add capabilities and is materially behind current upstream maintenance.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this older pinned snapshot. The fork adds no visible features and is 113 commits behind, so it is mainly useful as a starting point for custom work rather than a better end-user distribution.

Prefer this fork if you need extra compatibility and version coverage more than freshness. Prefer upstream if you want the most actively maintained and currently validated Windows-in-Docker experience.

Prefer upstream for a stable, current Windows-in-Docker setup. Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its legacy-compatibility and customization changes and are willing to accept slower maintenance and likely missing upstream fixes.