Discofork
Repository brief

jgthms/bulma

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis
cached 2026-03-30T13:01:03.582Z
3mo ago

jgthms/bulma

Bulma is a mature, actively maintained CSS framework based on Flexbox. It is CSS-only, ships Sass source plus compiled CSS, and has extensive adoption signals: 50,070 stars, 3,905 forks, and a recent push on 2026-03-01.

GitHub
Loading tags...
Stars50,070
Forks3,905
Default branchmain
Last pushed2026-03-01T20:13:02Z
Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

10 of 10 fork briefs
Selected

Prefer this fork only if RTL support is the primary requirement and you can tolerate a stale codebase; otherwise upstream Bulma is the safer choice.

Choose this fork only if attribute-based selectors are the point of the project. For most adopters, upstream Bulma is the safer default because this fork is highly stale and likely missing years of fixes and features.

Choose this fork if CSS-variable theming is the goal and you want Bulma with runtime customization hooks. Stick with upstream if you need current maintenance, lower divergence, and the broadest compatibility with the main Bulma release line.

Prefer the fork only if you need its legacy, self-contained docs/assets state exactly as-is. For new work or anything that benefits from current Bulma fixes and maintenance, upstream is the better choice.

Choose upstream Bulma unless you specifically need this old snapshot; this fork adds no visible value and is stale relative to current maintenance.

Prefer upstream unless you already depend on this fork's theme/build changes. This fork is only a fit for legacy maintenance or a narrow customization need, not for new projects.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older, customized build-and-docs snapshot. It is a poor choice for new projects and a risky base for ongoing maintenance.

Choose this fork only if Stylus is a hard requirement. For most adopters, upstream Bulma is the safer choice because this fork is old, highly divergent, and likely behind on fixes and features.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need its older, customized Bulma snapshot. For new work or ongoing maintenance, upstream is the better default because this fork is stale and substantially behind.

Prefer upstream Bulma unless you specifically need this old SCSS-converted fork for legacy source-level customization. For new work, the fork is too stale and too far behind to be a safe default.