jqlang/jq

Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its binary/Unicode edge-case semantics; otherwise upstream jq is the safer choice because it is far more current, actively maintained, and less risky to adopt.

Prefer upstream jq unless you specifically need this fork's older release/build workflow or legacy platform support. For most adopters, the fork's staleness and divergence are a bigger liability than its added conveniences.

Prefer this fork only if the GUI workflow is the main requirement and you can tolerate being materially behind upstream jq; otherwise, upstream jq is the safer choice for compatibility, fixes, and ongoing maintenance.

Prefer upstream jq unless you specifically need this fork's legacy behavior or local customizations. Choose the fork only if its existing patches are required and you are prepared to maintain a significant downstream delta.

Prefer upstream jq unless you specifically need this old fork's historical behavior or its small set of extra CLI/documentation features. The fork is materially stale and divergent, so it is a poor choice for users who want current fixes, stability, and ongoing maintenance.

Prefer upstream jq unless you specifically need this fork as a private baseline or staging area. It adds no visible value and is already slightly behind upstream.

Choose upstream jq unless you specifically need a personal fork at this exact historical point. This fork is effectively upstream plus lag, not a differentiated downstream.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need an older pinned jq snapshot; this fork adds no visible capabilities and lags important upstream fixes.

Prefer upstream jq unless you specifically need this fork’s repository identity; this fork adds no visible value and is behind current upstream fixes.