naptha/tesseract.js

This looks like a light customization rather than a fundamentally different product.

This fork is materially different enough that adopters should validate long-term maintenance and upgrade cost.

This fork is materially different enough that adopters should validate long-term maintenance and upgrade cost.

This looks like a light customization rather than a fundamentally different product.

Prefer this fork if you want a narrow, custom OCR demo and do not need the latest upstream fixes. Prefer upstream if you want an actively maintained dependency with current performance, compatibility, and test updates.

Prefer this fork only if you need its older custom build and local-language-path behavior. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because it is much more current, better maintained, and supports more languages.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork’s legacy worker/tessdata path customization or you must preserve an old integration. For new work, the fork is too stale and too far behind current tesseract.js to recommend.

Adopt only if you want a clean, nearly upstream mirror. If you need the latest compatibility and maintenance work, upstream is the better default.