nektos/act
Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.
nektos/act
`nektos/act` is a large, active Go project for running GitHub Actions locally. It has strong adoption (69,620 stars, 1,895 forks), is not archived, and was updated recently on 2026-03-30. The repo focuses on local workflow execution via Docker and is documented as a way to get faster feedback and use GitHub Actions as a local task runner.
Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.
Choose a fork to inspect
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's compatibility patches or host/runtime customizations. Choose the fork if your blocker is one of its added workflows or platform fixes; otherwise the upstream project is the safer default.
Prefer upstream `nektos/act` unless you specifically need this exact stale snapshot; this fork adds no visible value and is materially behind current upstream.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need a stripped-down fork to build on. This fork looks less like a maintained alternative and more like an old, heavily pruned snapshot, so it is a poor choice for adopters who want current GitHub Actions compatibility.
Choose this fork only if you specifically need this frozen snapshot; otherwise upstream nektos/act is the better default because it is active and substantially ahead.
Prefer upstream for normal use. Pick this fork only if you need a frozen 2022-era `act` variant with its older compatibility patches and are willing to accept major maintenance lag.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need a private mirror or controlled fork point; this fork does not add observable capabilities and is behind current upstream.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this older snapshot or its bundled test/runtime fixtures. For normal adoption, this fork looks too stale and divergent to be a better default than `nektos/act`.
Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its added offline/remote-action workflows or its rootless fixes. For most adopters, the active upstream is the safer choice because this fork is stale and materially behind.
Choose this fork only if offline mode, the newer action cache option, or NetBSD support are the main requirements. If you want current `act` behavior, security fixes, and ongoing compatibility work, upstream is the better default.