nwjs/nw.js

Adopt this only if Apple M1 support on an older NW.js line is the main requirement. If you need current NW.js features, security fixes, or active maintenance, upstream is the better fit.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need its older, fork-specific runtime patches; otherwise upstream NW.js is the safer choice because this branch is stale, materially behind, and likely costly to maintain.

Prefer upstream NW.js unless you already depend on Tint-specific behavior. This fork looks like a legacy, highly diverged runtime with a few useful desktop-window additions, but it is too stale for new projects and risky for long-term maintenance.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need the Korean-localized, legacy NW.js branch and can accept major drift from upstream. For new work or ongoing maintenance, upstream is the better default.

Prefer upstream unless your main need is the Chinese-localized fork material itself. This fork looks like a historical translation-oriented branch, not a current runtime baseline.

Prefer upstream unless you explicitly need an old 2013-era node-webkit snapshot with a couple of local fixes. This fork is too stale for most adopters and is best treated as legacy code, not a living platform.

Prefer this fork only if you need legacy node-webkit behavior or one of its specific runtime fixes. For new work, upstream NW.js is the better default because this fork is extremely stale and materially behind current Chromium/Node and upstream bugfixes.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need an older, customized NW.js line and are prepared to own the maintenance burden. For new work or active runtime consumers, upstream is the better default.

Choose this fork only if you need the older NW.js 0.55 / Chromium 92 baseline and its local patches. For most adopters, upstream is the better choice because this fork is stale and materially behind on runtime, security, and compatibility updates.