Discofork
Repository brief

parallax/jsPDF

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis
cached 2026-03-30T19:49:01.845Z
1mo ago

parallax/jsPDF

jsPDF is a widely used, actively maintained JavaScript library for client-side PDF generation. It targets browser and Node.js usage, ships built artifacts and TypeScript types, and has a large fork/stars footprint that suggests a broad ecosystem and many derivative forks worth checking.

GitHub
Loading tags...
Stars31,198
Forks4,812
Default branchmaster
Last pushed2026-03-29T21:59:08Z
Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

10 of 10 fork briefs
Selected

Prefer upstream jsPDF unless you already depend on this fork's legacy SVG/path behavior. This fork is not a good default choice for new work because it is extremely stale and materially behind current jsPDF.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this 2012-era fork’s legacy behavior or bundled demo assets. For new work, the fork is too stale and too far behind to be a safe default.

Prefer this fork only if you already depend on its legacy HTML5/plugin behavior. For new work, upstream jsPDF is the safer choice because this fork is stale and substantially diverged.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's legacy TypeScript/PDF.js packaging behavior. For new adoption, the fork is too stale and too far behind to be a low-risk choice.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need this older snapshot. This fork appears inactive, adds no visible features, and lags 56 commits behind current jsPDF maintenance.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need the 2019 snapshot and its bundled demo/docs assets; for any actively maintained PDF generation dependency, upstream is the safer default.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this legacy fork's bundled viewer/demo setup or must preserve its 2017 behavior exactly. For new work or maintained products, this fork is too stale and too far from upstream to be the default choice.

Prefer upstream for almost any new work. Choose this fork only if you need its legacy image/compression/HTML patches and are prepared to absorb the maintenance burden of a very stale, highly divergent branch.

Prefer upstream unless you need one of the fork's early, specific behavior changes for a legacy codebase. For new work, this fork is too stale and too far behind upstream to be a safe default.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact 2024 snapshot. This fork adds no clear capabilities and is materially behind current jsPDF, so it is only attractive as a starting point for your own private work or for legacy pinning.