sheikhsajid69/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Selected Choose this fork only if its added LLM/MCP focus matches your target workflow and you are willing to own divergence. For most adopters needing broad connector support or a low-maintenance Pathway base, upstream is the safer choice.
tarxemo/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you want a customized Pathway base and can live without upstream parity. For most adopters, upstream Pathway is the safer choice because this fork is materially behind and appears to remove important database connector functionality.
riduwan45/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you want a customized, lower-level Pathway variant and can absorb the maintenance cost. If you want broad upstream compatibility, especially around Postgres, Kinesis, or MongoDB connectors, the upstream project is the safer choice.
Abhishek-Paspunuri/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer this fork only if its connector/storage changes match a specific internal need and you are prepared to own the maintenance burden. If you want broad Pathway compatibility, recent upstream fixes, or the full set of connectors, upstream is the safer choice.
Abhi-0930/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if its connector and storage changes are exactly what you need and you are willing to own divergence. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because this fork is stale, substantially different, and likely missing newer upstream capabilities.
urbanxtreme/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if its custom connector, storage, or runtime changes are the point. If you want the broadest Pathway feature set, fresher fixes, and easier adoption, upstream is the safer choice.
Aj1185/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer this fork only if its added ingestion controls match your exact workflow and you can live without upstream's broader connector set. For general adoption, upstream looks safer because this fork is substantially behind and has clearly removed important capabilities.
SunnyAgrwl05/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer this fork only if you want to own substantial Pathway internals and can accept losing upstream compatibility, especially around PostgreSQL. For most adopters, upstream looks safer and more complete.
dewanshshekhar/pathway
stale
significant_divergence
Choose this fork only if you specifically need the enterprise/offline changes and can absorb long-term maintenance. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because this fork is stale and appears to have lost important connector functionality.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact older snapshot as a starting point. This fork adds nothing yet and is already behind the active upstream by a few commits.