yangsuzhou/wifi-densepose
Selected Choose this fork only if you specifically want an older, unchanged RuView baseline. For new adoption, upstream is the better choice because it is active and contains substantial recent multi-node, firmware, and server-side fixes.
deletexiumu/wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream if you want a working WiFi sensing platform. Prefer this fork only if you want the audit/warning narrative and do not need current functionality or documentation.
LuisKoo/ruvnet_wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream RuView unless you specifically need this fork's branding or are starting a new private derivative. This fork is behind by 211 commits and shows no unique code changes, so it adds no clear product value while increasing maintenance risk.
ShabbirHasan1/wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream unless you specifically want this fork's branding or repository identity. The fork shows no concrete functional additions and is far behind upstream, so it is a weaker choice for adopters who need current fixes, active maintenance, or the latest multi-node sensing work.
Moekyawaung-dev/wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact snapshot. This fork does not show added capabilities; it mainly reflects an older, stale copy of RuView.
moekyawaungmka2032-boop/wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Prefer upstream for almost everyone. Choose this fork only if you need a pinned, unmodified snapshot of RuView and are willing to backport upstream fixes yourself.
Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact older snapshot. This fork does not add capabilities and is materially behind on active sensing, firmware, and server work, so adopters should expect to inherit missed fixes and newer workflows.
flaxguo/wifi-densepose
stale
significant_divergence
Do not adopt this as a maintenance fork unless you specifically need the older upstream snapshot; active users should prefer current upstream because this fork adds nothing and is substantially behind.
Prefer this fork only if you want an almost-stock RuView checkout to branch from. If you want the latest sensing-server, firmware, and multi-node fixes, upstream is the better starting point.
Choose the upstream project instead unless you specifically want a clean, lightly modified mirror to build your own work on top of. This fork does not show added capabilities, and it is behind on recent sensing-server and firmware fixes.