saadeghi/daisyui

Choose this fork only if you want a staging-oriented, slower-moving copy for docs or bundle testing. If you want current daisyUI features, fixes, and documentation, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer this fork only if you need its custom docs/theming/workflow changes and are prepared to maintain a deep divergence. For most adopters who want the upstream component library with current fixes, the upstream repo is the safer choice.

Treat this as an outdated mirror, not a differentiated fork. Choose it only if you specifically want an older snapshot; otherwise use upstream daisyUI.

Choose this fork only if you want its custom docs/experiment/product-site direction and are willing to own a large maintenance burden. If you want a current, low-risk Tailwind component library, upstream is the better default.

Prefer this fork only if you want a customized experimental/docs codebase. If you want a maintained Tailwind component library, upstream is the better choice.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this older experimental/docs snapshot; the fork is too stale for most production adoption and appears to add only niche workflow value.

Choose this fork only if you want a diverged experimental/docs-heavy base and are prepared to own maintenance. For most adopters wanting daisyUI as a component library, upstream is the better fit because this fork is stale and structurally far away from current releases.

Prefer this fork only if you need its experiment/documentation scaffolding and do not care about staying current with upstream. For most adopters, upstream daisyUI is the better default because this fork is materially stale and highly divergent.

Do not adopt this as a current upstream base unless you specifically want a long-stale, highly diverged fork. It is better suited as a custom legacy derivative than as a low-maintenance path to daisyUI.