sansan0/TrendRadar

Prefer this fork if you value onboarding, guided deployment, and MCP-oriented workflows over strict upstream freshness. Prefer upstream if you need the latest fixes, broader compatibility, or a lower-risk maintenance path.

Adopt this fork only if you specifically want its branding or documented positioning. If you want the most complete and current implementation, upstream is the safer choice because this fork shows no code divergence and is 13 commits behind.

Prefer this fork only if its report UX and custom notification/MCP flow are exactly what you need. If you want ongoing maintenance, upstream compatibility, and the latest fixes, upstream is the safer default.

Prefer this fork if you specifically want Chinese-platform monitoring and report generation in a narrower workflow. Prefer upstream if you want the newer MCP, AI, Docker, and broader maintenance path.

Choose this fork only if you specifically want its localized Chinese-platform framing and can accept lagging 33 commits behind upstream. For most adopters, upstream is the safer choice because it appears more current and better maintained.

Prefer this fork if you want a more guided, AI- and MCP-centered TrendRadar experience and do not mind divergence. Prefer upstream if you want the newest fixes, less maintenance risk, and a cleaner path for future updates.

Choose this fork if you want a more opinionated, documentation-rich TrendRadar variant and you are comfortable owning divergence. Choose upstream if you want the newest report, MCP, Docker, and notification behavior with lower integration risk.

Choose this fork if you want added sources, a visual dashboard, and more automation. Choose upstream if you value staying current with the main project and want the safest path for future upgrades.

Choose this fork if you want a more customized, analysis-heavy TrendRadar experience and can accept drift from upstream. Choose upstream if you value fresher maintenance, tighter compatibility, and fewer merge risks.