serhii-londar/open-source-mac-os-apps

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need an older, customized snapshot. This fork looks better as a starting point for a bespoke catalog project than as a living source of current macOS app recommendations.

Choose upstream if you want current recommendations and active maintenance. Choose this fork only if you want an older, diverged snapshot with a few extra curation tweaks and do not care about freshness.

Choose upstream unless you specifically want a near-identical snapshot; this fork adds no visible capabilities and is already behind current upstream content.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need the Applite addition or want this exact snapshot; the fork is otherwise too close to upstream and too far behind to justify as a general replacement.

Choose this fork only if you want a mostly static, manually curated macOS app list and do not need upstream freshness, automation, or completeness. For most adopters, upstream is the better default.

Choose the upstream if you want current coverage and active maintenance. Choose this fork only if you specifically want an old, simplified snapshot you plan to maintain yourself.

Prefer upstream for an up-to-date recommendation source. Choose this fork only if you specifically want an older frozen catalog or plan to rework it into a custom list.

Choose the fork only if you want a legacy snapshot or a heavily customized starting point. For anyone who wants a current, actively maintained macOS apps directory, upstream is the better default.

Choose the fork only if you want a static, older curated list to customize. If you want current recommendations, active curation, and the full upstream workflow, upstream is the better choice by a wide margin.