shadcn-ui/ui

Choose this fork only if you want Kodkafa-specific branding and workflow changes and do not need to stay close to upstream. For most adopters, upstream shadcn-ui/ui is the safer choice because this fork is heavily behind and appears to remove or replace substantial upstream registry/example content.

Choose this fork only if you need its older registry/CLI behavior and are prepared to own the drift. If you want current shadcn/ui components, examples, and maintenance, upstream is the better default.

Choose this fork only if its added framework and registry workflows match your needs. If you want the safest path for a general-purpose shadcn/ui install, upstream is a better default because this fork is materially behind and appears to have removed or replaced a lot of upstream content.

Choose this fork if your goal is to launch or customize a shadcn registry quickly. Choose upstream if you want the latest full component platform, broader framework support, and less divergence risk.

Prefer the upstream project unless you specifically need this older snapshot. This fork offers no visible extra capability, while upstream has continued active maintenance and feature work.