/jump to repo

Repos Recent Bookmarks Watched Notes Tags Discover Compare Stats GitHub

Repository brief

sorrycc/awesome-javascript

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis

cached 2026-03-31T09:55:49.662Z

1mo ago

sorrycc/awesome-javascript

`sorrycc/awesome-javascript` is a large, actively maintained curated list of browser-side JavaScript libraries, resources, and related links. It is a high-star, high-fork repository whose value is primarily as a reference index rather than executable software.

Loading tags...

Stars34,938

Forks4,526

Default branchmaster

Last pushed2026-03-16T02:09:30Z

Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

10 of 10 fork briefs

Maintenance:

Magnitude:

Sort:

Selected

Choose upstream unless you specifically want this fork's older, customized curation. This fork is best seen as a personal snapshot with reduced maintenance and weaker contribution automation, not as a better general-purpose reference.

Prefer upstream if you want a current, maintained resource index. Choose this fork only if you specifically want an old, simplified snapshot and are willing to restore missing content and workflows yourself.

Prefer the upstream repository if you want a current, maintained resource index. Choose this fork only if you specifically want an old archived copy and are willing to update it yourself.

Prefer upstream for an actively maintained, current resource index. Choose this fork only if you want the older 2015 snapshot and are comfortable rebuilding maintenance and contributor tooling yourself.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this exact old snapshot or want Inferno baked into a frozen list. For most adopters, the fork is too stale to be a good starting point.

Choose upstream unless you specifically need a stale historical snapshot; this fork adds no visible functionality and is far behind current maintenance.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older snapshot or its historical edits; adopters should expect missing modern coverage and weaker maintenance.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically want a frozen starting point; this fork adds no visible capabilities and is materially behind on content.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically want the lone `codecrumbs` addition. This fork adds almost nothing, while losing most of upstream's ongoing curation and freshness.

Adopt this only if you want a static baseline to rewrite. If you want a current JavaScript resource index, upstream is clearly the better choice.

Fork comparison

jeffling/awesome-javascript

38/100

stale

significant_divergence

Choose upstream unless you specifically want this fork's older, customized curation. This fork is best seen as a personal snapshot with reduced maintenance and weaker contribution automation, not as a better general-purpose reference.

Likely purpose

To keep a private or opinionated version of the awesome-javascript list with older selections and custom link curation, rather than to stay current with upstream.

Best for

People who specifically want this fork's older curated snapshot or its customized README content.; Maintainers starting a new awesome-list variant from an already edited baseline.; Users who do not need current ecosystem coverage and prefer a frozen reference.

Additional features

Custom README curation with many fork-specific additions and removals to reshape the resource list.
A custom GitHub workflow validator for checking contribution or README content in the forked repo.
A fork-branded presentation that signals this copy is intentionally opinionated and not intended as the canonical list.
Adds or extends platform-specific client support, such as mobile, Android, iOS, or desktop packaging.
Changes agent workflow behavior, such as prompt handling, handoffs, worktrees, memory, or orchestration flow.

Missing features

It lags far behind upstream and appears to miss 425 upstream commits, so it likely lacks many newer library and resource additions.
It removes the upstream pull request template, which makes structured contribution harder.
It removes the upstream validation workflow, so automated contribution checks are reduced or absent.
It is frozen in an older 2015-era state, so users should expect outdated links and categories compared with upstream.
It trails upstream by 425 commits, so some recent upstream features and fixes are likely not present yet.

Strengths

Useful if you want a static snapshot or a heavily edited personal reference list.
The fork changes are concentrated in the README, so the repo stays simple and easy to scan.
Can serve as a starting point for rebuilding a smaller curated list without upstream's full churn.

Risks

The fork is very stale, so most adopters will get older guidance than upstream.
Removal of validation and PR scaffolding makes ongoing maintenance more manual.
Large behind count means the fork can silently miss entire categories of newer ecosystem tools.
The fork's value is mostly historical or personal; it is not a good default choice for current reference needs.