vitejs/vite

Prefer upstream Vite unless you specifically need this fork’s custom runtime/build/workflow changes and are prepared to maintain a very old, highly divergent codebase yourself.

Prefer upstream Vite unless you specifically need this fork’s custom core behavior and are prepared to maintain a large divergence. This fork looks suitable for internal experimentation or a bespoke toolchain, but it is too stale and too far from upstream to be the safer default for general adoption.

Prefer this fork only if you need its snapshot-specific behavior or backports and are prepared to own the maintenance. If you want current Vite features, compatibility, and lower operational risk, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork only if you need its specific local changes and are prepared to own a stale, highly divergent codebase. For most adopters, upstream Vite is the safer default because this fork is materially behind and likely costlier to maintain.

Choose this fork only if you need its specific 2023-era customizations and are willing to own the maintenance burden. For most adopters, upstream Vite is the safer and more current choice.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its legacy behavior and are prepared to maintain it yourself; otherwise current upstream is the safer choice for features, fixes, and ecosystem compatibility.

Choose this fork only if you specifically need its customized 2024-era Vite state. For most adopters, upstream is the better choice because this fork is stale and far behind current fixes and releases.

Choose this fork only if you need its specific downstream changes and are prepared to maintain them yourself. For most adopters, upstream Vite is the better choice because it is active, current, and much lower risk to integrate.

Choose this fork only if you need its custom Vite internals and are prepared to maintain a large upstream gap. For most users, upstream Vite is the safer choice because it is far more current, actively maintained, and less risky to adopt.