vuetifyjs/vuetify

Choose this fork only if you are committed to a legacy Vuetify 1.5/Vue 2 baseline and need existing downstream customizations. If you want current Vuetify features, fixes, and low-maintenance upgrades, upstream is the better fit.

Prefer this fork only if you need its markdown editor customizations and are maintaining that legacy product. For general Vuetify adoption, upstream is the better choice because this fork is stale and substantially behind.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older component behavior or Yarn-based workflow. The fork is too stale and too far from upstream to be a low-risk default choice.

Prefer this fork only if you specifically need its downstream customizations and are prepared to carry a large rebase burden. For most adopters, upstream Vuetify is the safer choice because this fork is stale and materially behind.

Prefer upstream unless you specifically need this fork's older snapshot and local workflow changes. For new adoption, the combination of staleness and large divergence makes it a high-maintenance choice.

Choose this fork only if you need an old, customized Vuetify baseline and are prepared to own a large backport burden. If you want a maintained component framework with current fixes and tooling, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork only if you need to stay on a legacy Vue 2/Vuetify 1.x branch. If you want current framework support, active fixes, and modern tooling, upstream is the better choice by a wide margin.

Prefer this fork only for legacy Vue 2 maintenance or if its added APIs are required and you can accept major drift. For new work or active maintenance, upstream is the clear choice.

Choose this fork only if its custom behavior is important enough to justify owning a stale, highly diverged codebase. If you want current Vuetify fixes, Vue compatibility, and lower long-term maintenance cost, upstream is the safer choice.