/jump to repo

Repos Recent Bookmarks Watched Notes Tags Discover Compare Stats GitHub

Repository brief

x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools

Read the upstream summary on the left, browse the cached forks below it, and load each fork comparison into the right-hand panel.

Cached analysis

cached 2026-03-29T22:09:34.517Z

3mo ago

x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools

A very large curated collection of system prompts, internal tools, and model-related files for many AI coding assistants and products. It is popular and active, but the repository content is mostly a broad prompt/tool archive rather than a software project with a clear runtime or app structure.

Loading tags...

Stars133,629

Forks33,691

Default branchmain

Last pushed2026-03-28T16:58:37Z

Recommended shortcuts

Jump straight into Discofork's strongest cached fork picks, or open a compare view in one click.

Forks

Choose a fork to inspect

6 of 6 fork briefs

Maintenance:

Magnitude:

Sort:

Selected

Choose this fork if you value Chinese localization and a curated prompt-reference experience. Stick with upstream if you need the broadest and most current coverage across all listed AI products.

Choose upstream if you want the most complete and current prompt archive. Choose this fork only if you specifically want a smaller, older subset and can accept missing newer upstream content.

Choose upstream unless you specifically want a frozen snapshot. This fork adds no visible capabilities and is 378 commits behind, so it is mainly useful as an archive copy rather than the best source for current prompt collections.

Choose this fork only if you want a narrower, easier-to-scan subset of the upstream archive. If you need current or broad coverage across many AI tools, upstream is the better choice.

Choose this fork if you want a more focused, curated prompt pack with newer assistant-specific files. Choose upstream if completeness, breadth, and freshness matter more.

Choose this fork only if you want a narrower, more opinionated subset of the prompt archive. If you care about breadth, freshness, or vendor coverage, upstream is clearly the better default.

Fork comparison

shareAI-lab/share-best-prompt

54/100

slowing

substantial

Choose this fork if you value Chinese localization and a curated prompt-reference experience. Stick with upstream if you need the broadest and most current coverage across all listed AI products.

Likely purpose

To serve Chinese-speaking adopters who want a more readable, curated copy of popular AI assistant prompts and internal-tool references, rather than the full fast-moving upstream archive.

Best for

Chinese-speaking researchers of AI system prompts.; People who want a translated prompt reference rather than the full upstream archive.; Users interested in a curated subset of prompt collections for a few specific assistants.

Additional features

Chinese translations for v0 prompt/tool materials.
Added or refreshed prompt content for specific assistants such as v0, Amp, and Manus.
Localized documentation that lowers the barrier for non-English readers to compare and reuse prompt artifacts.
Adds plugin, tool, or MCP-style extensibility beyond the upstream baseline.
Changes agent workflow behavior, such as prompt handling, handoffs, worktrees, memory, or orchestration flow.

Missing features

Falls far behind upstream overall, with 383 commits behind and a much smaller change surface than the source repo.
Likely misses many recent upstream updates across major product areas such as Anthropic, Cursor, Comet Assistant, Orchids.app, and other fast-moving prompt sets.
The heavy deletions suggest some upstream prompt content or breadth is harder to access in this fork than in the parent repository.
It trails upstream by 383 commits, so some recent upstream features and fixes are likely not present yet.

Strengths

Better fit for Chinese-speaking users.
More focused reading experience for people interested in selected prompt sets instead of the entire upstream firehose.
Useful as a translated reference library for studying assistant prompts and tools.

Risks

Because it is far behind upstream, it may miss the newest prompt behavior and product coverage.
Large deletions may reduce completeness compared with the parent archive.
Users depending on broad, current coverage across many assistants should verify against upstream before adopting.